Frequently Asked Questions

Yes — by a wide margin.

Government consultation processes are not symbolic. Formal submissions and direct correspondence are reviewed, catalogued, and assessed as evidence within decision-making processes. They carry substantially more institutional weight than other forms of public expression.

Based on historical consultation data and departmental handling practices, different advocacy actions typically have the following relative impact:

• Formal written submissions are treated as evidence and score approximately 90/100 for impact
• A small number of genuinely unique, well-written emails are logged and reviewed individually (~80/100 impact)
• Large petitions or templated emails — even when numbering in the thousands — are grouped and summarised (~40/100 impact)
• Large-scale protests and viral social media activity primarily influence visibility, not decisions (~25/100 impact)

The distinction is critical: submissions and letters are evidence, while petitions, protests, and social posts are treated as signals of sentiment. Awareness can support a campaign, but it does not replace the formal mechanisms governments rely on when making decisions.

Ready to take action? Use the message generator to create a submission you can review and edit before sending.

This is critical.

Government departments actively screen submissions for duplication, templating, and mass-generated content. Letters that share the same structure, phrasing, or argument patterns are frequently grouped, discounted, or disregarded entirely.

In practical terms, a large volume of templated emails is treated no differently to a petition — regardless of how many people send them. In some cases, reliance on templated content can actively weaken a campaign by signalling automation rather than genuine public concern.

Givee's AI letter-generation system is engineered specifically to avoid this risk. Every letter is:

• Structurally distinct
• Semantically unique
• Argumentatively re-weighted
• Written in a genuinely human voice

This ensures submissions retain their full evidentiary value. You can review the full terms and privacy details before participating.

Most "AI letter" tools rely on static templates with surface-level variation. Givee does not.

Givee's system dynamically reasons about:

• Argument framing and emphasis, recalibrated for each generation
• Narrative flow and tone, avoiding recognisable patterns
• Subject line differentiation, ensuring no repeated or near-duplicate headlines
• Sentence-level and paragraph-level structure, continuously reassembled
• Deep machine-learning-driven variation, enabling constant evolution, hyper-personalised results, and long-run entropy at scale

This architecture allows the same individual, using the same form inputs, to generate 100,000 letters — with every single letter remaining genuinely unique.

The outcome is not cosmetic variation, but structural, semantic, and rhetorical diversity that holds up under scrutiny — even when hundreds of millions of people take action through the same campaign.

Yes — and this is precisely where Givee excels.

The real challenge in advocacy is not choosing between volume or quality, but achieving both simultaneously.Givee's system is designed for campaigns operating at national or global scale while preserving the individuality of every submission.

This ensures scale strengthens impact rather than diluting credibility.

Givee is an Australian platform specialising in ethical fundraising, advocacy technology, and civic engagement infrastructure.

Givee builds tools that enable communities, charities, and campaigns to mobilise supporters responsibly, generate high-impact submissions, and maintain trust with decision-makers and regulators.

The Southern Sea campaign uses Givee's technology to ensure participation is effective, credible, and institutionally respected.

Givee provides a full ecosystem of fundraising and engagement tools designed for charities, community groups, campaigns, venues, and events — not just advocacy.

In addition to AI-powered letter and submission tools, Givee's platform includes:

• Tap-to-donate fundraising using NFC-enabled devices and QR codes
• Digital raffles, including compliant ticketing, prize management, and draw tools
• Event-based fundraising solutions for festivals, sporting events, and community activations
• Micro-donations and tipping tools for cafes, retail venues, and hospitality partners
• Campaign landing pages and engagement flows optimised for conversion and participation
• Advocacy and civic engagement infrastructure for petitions, email campaigns, and coordinated actions

All products are built with a consistent emphasis on compliance, transparency, trust, and measurable real-world impact.

Your submission becomes part of the official consultation record. It is reviewed alongside others and contributes directly to the assessment of public concern.

While no single letter guarantees an outcome, large volumes of genuinely unique, high-quality submissions materially influence policy decisions — particularly when they cannot be dismissed as coordinated or automated.

Because the consequences are permanent.

Once approvals are granted, they are extremely difficult to reverse. This campaign prioritises doing advocacy properly, using tools that protect legitimacy and maximise institutional impact rather than chasing superficial metrics.

Effectiveness matters more than convenience.